“Everyone to their own taste” that is how I see art. Art is
full of variety and because of that is very difficult to not fall in love with
an artist’s work. On a short visit to the
museum Moma PS1, I found one curious art work and the rest nothing to say.
The art work I
liked the most at this museum was (Golden Ghost “The Belongs to Ghost”) by
Surasi Kusolwong. This is a great job to point at our economical situation,
beside that is fun. I like his authenticity, I mean “To take jewelry and put
them in a place where (while searching for them) you have fun” According to the
information posted, there are 4.5 tools of thread waste pure gold necklaces
with golden ghost motif mirror wooden. I guess that the main idea for this work
from Kusolwong is to be happy face even though if you are going through a hard
time. This work reminds me of my childhood when I used to play in the
playground with the balls in there.
On the other
hand, I found three art works that I did not understand pretty much and those
arts are: “Serve up” 2009 (Collection Hudgins Family, New York), Untitled 1999
(Courtesy the Artist), and “Fist and Fury” 2007 (Collection Jonathan and Cathy
Miller). Those 3 art works are confusing to me because they all belong to
different artists and show a dish with spaghetti. What I don’t understand is
why they concentrated their art in food. To add more, because I don’t
understand those works I considered that I don’t like them, even though, I like
to investigate something deeper, but this is not the case. They did not take my
attention in a “Wow”. I think that the spaghettis are interesting but at the
same time it’s what really killed my appreciation about them.
All in all,
for a work to be a good art, does not necessarily should have its message clear
but it must have something that make you think “Hey! This is great!” For me a
art work that does not call my attention, it’s discarded.
No comments:
Post a Comment